Strong piece of theme, but I don’t like the idea of adding in what are effectively rules the group didn’t vote for, which may be poorly written, or not even written publicly at all. What are other players meant to do if I make and sign a Treaty of “Kevan cannot take the action he has written on a Post-It note”, and then take every game action once?

Proposals seem like they’d do the job here. If two countries want to make a pact that only affects themselves, they shouldn’t have difficulty attracting supporting votes from unrelated ministers.

I really like the theme though, maybe we could re-work it somehow?

Also, the clear intent clause could be standardized to an exact phrase. But no big.

Now I want to write a Proposal titled “Treaty: not a Treaty” and write a rule describing that, say, pokes cannot take dynastic actions. Would you sign or vote?

Jk jk.

It would be posted before this passed, of course, to avoid confusion.