Just checking something – I think existing Ballots are still valid even if a new player joins (the requirement to list all Plans is a requirement to change a Ballot, not a requirement for a Ballot to be valid). If it did invalidate existing Ballots, though, this proposal would be scammable; so if you think my rules interpretation here is wrong, it is probably best to speak up before this proposal passes.

I do not think that it invalidates any ballots, although I do think people should update their ballots as a matter of course.

Agreed that the current rule text for Ballots does not invalidate them when a new Plan is added (new Drafter or existing Drafter that didn’t previously have a Plan), or removed for that matter.

Would also agree that ballots weren’t invalidated, but I don’t think we should remove the equilibrium of current 48 hour rule.

If one or two players swap out their Ballot for tactical reasons at 11:59pm on the 29th, or persuade enough idle players to join and change the Runoff’s outcome, it’ll be down to pot luck and timezones whether enough other players have time to react to that before the Supervisor processes the Runoff.

Withdrawn per Kevan - it feels like we’re in the wrap-up phase anyway.