I like how it only works if the Speaker wants it to; he could just never use it.

 
I’ve decided I like it.

It may lose my credibility but I will never vote for the speedy veto. Read my lips: no speedy veto!

Per Josh and precedent.

Never!

I wouldn’t have voted for it, but we already have fast passing and failing.

Yeah, and that mechanism applies to vetoes as well. It’s sufficient; I don’t want the emperor deciding to hand proposal slots back by fiat.

But remember that the speaker no longer has a vote before 48 hours. Opinion could still be expressed this way.

Vetoes aren’t restricted in the same way as other votes.

per Kevan

  (explicit arrow casting)

I’m usually against fast veto, but as RaichuKFM said, we already have fast thing, and I don’t like having to cast a vote on a Proposal that has been vetoed already.

the fast passing thing is bad enough. please no speedy veto.

CoV

I don’t want to have to vote on a proposal that’s going to fail anyway to avoid losing credibility; I’m not supporting this for automatic slot return; I usually don’t expend my allotted slots. I’m in favor of the clearing of the cache aspect. Again, I would not usually support this, but in a dynasty that is focusing on messing with core mechanics, especially voting, I think this is appropriate.

oh wait, you’ve realized that punishing people who vote against passing proposals is *also* a bad idea?

I like how “Lets have a dynasty that messes with the voting mechanics” has turned into “lets try to add every single terrible way to mess with voting mechanics we can”

If it’s vetoed, nobody loses Credibility anyway.

Speaking of which, a sizable amount of us are looking at a loss of Credibility. But I’m going down with this ship!

since the 48-hour limit is coming up.

Fail now?