Its interesting how this plays with Tapped Out.

On the one hand, if you have a few inactive people on your team you have less people to be Down. On the other, you’ll get less total contribution points. So maybe it balances out?

This competes with my victory proposal.

@Silverwing It incorporates it

I’m up for a simpler endgame, personally.

“A Team is Triumphant if any of the following things are true… Any Team named in a Championship Belt post is Triumphant” does not mean what it looks like it means.

Yeah, I’m thinking that it’s kind of vague what makes a post a C.B. post. But at least it seems like there’s no wincon loophole; if it’s defined as a post that’s titled “C.B.”, then such posts would be Official, and thus, only postable via this rule. (And if it isn’t defined, the rule is benignly nonfunctional.)

Oh, but I guess one trick is that you could always put extra teams in there, along with the team that’s identified. :/

Oh! Aaaand, also, I guess Bucky’s point was that if this passes, the second bullet might just be instantly true…?

Kind of like when you put “if (x = 1)” instead of “if (x == 1)” in C code.

;tl dr Rule’s broke, don’t pass or dynasty ‘plodes.

i’d rather just compare contribution pools, personally. the simplicity fits such a short dynasty, n with something like this the stat of Contribution becomes unmoored from how much the realtor directly contributed to a team’s success!

Withdrawn