I’ll let the others choose which CfJ they prefer, and if it’s this one I’ll vote for it.

This is too quick a fix.

If a player believes that a rule let them do something surprising, and a quorum don’t think that it did, we should humour them and amend the rule to remove that perceived ability. Otherwise (social pressure aside) they could just perform the same action again in the future, with the same arguments.

I was not aware of the craction wielding rule, I think this is the most clear way to fix what happened, and if there’s still uncertainty in the wording we can use proposals to fix that.

On the grounds that taken literally, there is no such gamestate value as “HP” and this just gives +1 Alertness to two of the players involved.

This also makes no attempt to clean up the situation we’re now in where the Crate is still active and Diabecko has to choose between taking an item, or politely waiting for CfJs to resolve at the risk of being timed out and missing out on this crate entirely.