Timed out 1 vote to 7. Failed by Kevan.
Adminned at 02 Oct 2021 14:38:44 UTC
Add the following to “Floors”:
A Proposal which would modify the status of any dynastic rule if enacted is Unpopular if any Citizen is both occupying the Zone associated with that rule and has a valid Vote of AGAINST on that Proposal.
@Cuddlebeam: the wording is stolen shamelessly from “Breaker Access”.
What exactly does it mean to “modify the status of a dynastic rule”?
I don’t think zoning counts, if that’s what you’re getting at. While zones include floors, I don’t think zones are properties of floors. But this is a poor phrasing which I unfortunately did not catch in time to fix.
What I’m getting at is, I don’t think “the status of a dynastic rule” has any meaning.
As adding proposals would modify which floors a dynastic rule correspond to, which is part of the status of that rule, and thus this gives people wide range vetoes.
@Clucky my opinion is that it doesn’t but that isn’t an unreasonable interpretation either.
Assuming “the status of” were removed, how would those voting against feel about it? I don’t want to waste another proposal slot if there are other major objections.
“modify the text of a rule and/or its subrules” would receive my vote, for future version ref.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Madrid:
So basically VETO.
Hmm.