Saturday, April 17, 2021

Proposal: Version Control

Quorum reached @ 8-0.  - Jumble

Adminned at 18 Apr 2021 00:45:41 UTC

Add a rule called “Versions” and give it the following text

Each AI has a Version, which defaults to the median Version of all other AI’s Version. When an AI is Reinitialized, rather than being set to its default value, their Version is increased by one. The Limit is one quarter of the number of AIs, rounded down. An AI may not achieve victory while total the number of AIs (including the AI in question) whose Version is equal to or greater than their own Version AI is less than the Limit.

Remove the text “At any time, the Facility Head may Reinitialize an Errant AI whose Focus is a Monitored or Surveillance Location.” from the rule “Reinitialization”

Add the line “Reinitialize any Errant AI whose Focus is a Monitored or Surveillance Location.” after the line “Clear the Behavior Log.” in “Nosy Researchers”

If “Favours” is a dynastic rule, add “For the purposes of other rules, Favours are considered to be non-dynastic variables”  to it

Feels like resetting should come at a cost. Blocking the top 25% from winning feels like it should be enough to prevent one person in a cabal from tanking extra hard so another can still get reset a lot but not be ruled out of winning.

Down the road, think it would be cool to add new abilities having higher version # unlocks, which means you actually want to get reset some but you need to make sure you don’t wind up over the limit.

Comments

lemon: she/her

17-04-2021 02:56:23 UTC

oh, this is neat!! i’m planning on proposing some additions/modifications to the Reinitialization rule, so i’ll probably try to move that atomic action step around with my next proposal, but overall the idea of wanting to get reset sometimes is v fun :O

one thing is that, as it stands, the Limit will be three; that means that as it stands u have to be in 1st or 2nd place in terms of version # to win the dynasty, and that seems like a very harsh restriction

lemon: she/her

17-04-2021 03:04:39 UTC

cont: since its actually way easier to get reinitialized than to not get reinitialized, i think it should remain a hazard and not a win condition, even if it has some silver linings

Clucky: he/him

17-04-2021 04:16:05 UTC

Hrm? Right now, if you have the highest limit then there is 1 AI with equal or greater Version, which is less than the limit, so you cannot achieve victory. If there is one person higher than you, you also cannot achieve victory.

I had planned to make it so that if there were two people higher, you still can’t but forgot the “less than or equal” bit. Oh well, we can fix that later. Overarching point is that 1st and 2nd cannot achieve victory.

lemon: she/her

17-04-2021 04:19:13 UTC

oh wait– my bad!! somewhere in that last sentence i flipped it around, with the less than & greater than & 25% subset & ‘may not’. sorry about that– ur right and u’ve got my for vote on this one

Lulu: she/her

17-04-2021 04:20:51 UTC

for

Lulu: she/her

17-04-2021 04:51:02 UTC

against sorry, it’s too abusable with Understanding

Clucky: he/him

17-04-2021 05:25:28 UTC

Abuseable how? Like sure you could is it to reset. But in its current form version only hurts to have so I’m not sure why you’d want to reset.

Lulu: she/her

17-04-2021 05:26:53 UTC

it seems incredibly easy to catch up in version number if you’re behind a fair amount and want that cool new thing that unlocks at a higher version

Lulu: she/her

17-04-2021 05:27:15 UTC

for actually, I’m going to propose a fix

Clucky: he/him

17-04-2021 05:36:41 UTC

i feel like that is an issue we can take into effect when and if we ever make it so that higher versions give you cool new powers

Kevan: he/him

17-04-2021 08:28:55 UTC

for

Josh: Observer he/they

17-04-2021 09:32:17 UTC

for

Janet: she/her

17-04-2021 14:28:40 UTC

for

Casio:

17-04-2021 16:59:38 UTC

for

pokes:

17-04-2021 22:48:00 UTC

for