Thursday, October 27, 2016

Proposal: Victory Buffet

Timed out / quorumed 3 votes to 0. Enacted by Kevan with no EVC riders getting two approvals.

Adminned at 29 Oct 2016 21:17:13 UTC

Replace the final paragraph of “Government” with:-

As a daily communal action which is also an Atomic Action, and which may only be taken on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, a Councillor may call an Election by:

  • If a single Party is supported by more Constituencies than every other Party, then updating the Government to be that Party.
  • Increasing the Will of all Councillors who are part of the Government Party by 1.
  • Posting a blog entry announcing which Party each Constituency Supports, which Party is now in Government, and which Councillors gained Will from this Election.

If, at the time of an Election, a Councillor has fulfilled the following conditions:

  • the Councillor is part of the Government Party
  • the Councillor has more Will than any other Councillor

then they have aggrieved vectorine.

If more than half of the EVCs on this Proposal contain the word “POPULAR” then add the following to the second bulleted list above:

  • the Councillor is Popular

If more than half of the EVCs on this Proposal contain the word “TRANSITION” then add the following to the second bulleted list above:

  • the Councillor has at least 4 Ready Staff

If more than half of the EVCs on this Proposal contain the word “DEMOGRAPHIC” then add the following to the second bulleted list above:

  • the Councillor represents a Constituency which has fewer than 10 Blocks

If more than half of the EVCs on this Proposal contain the word “GRASSROOTS” then add the following to the second bulleted list above:

  • the Councillor is part of the Party with Grassroots Support

If more than half of the EVCs on this Proposal contain the word “UNWILLING” then remove the item “the Councillor has more Will than any other Councillor” from the second bulleted list above.

If you have suggestions for tweaking this, please add note commentary so I can consider it. If you don’t like this general framework for a victory condition, please, please propose your own.

Comments

Kevan: HE/HIM

10-27-2016 18:46:23 UTC

Note: This is only going to get a silly placeholder AGAINST vote from me while it still has all those EVC clauses, because I don’t know what I’m going to be voting on.

Maybe have a placeholder keyword instead of “achieves victory”, and plug it into the mains with another proposal afterwards, if everyone’s happy with how the EVCs fall? Wiring up the victory condition shouldn’t be done lightly.

Brendan: HE/HIM

10-27-2016 20:07:58 UTC

Note: okay.

Kevan: HE/HIM

10-27-2016 21:24:29 UTC

for POPULAR.

Brendan: HE/HIM

10-28-2016 14:19:10 UTC

Explicit for

Matt:

10-28-2016 19:49:23 UTC

for