Yeah, not quite what I had in mind.

“Many timed?” 

Also, this game doesn’t work unless everyone agrees it’s a good idea, as the optimal strategy is for anyone who votes FOR and was voted after to change to AGAINST.

There will probably be a flurry of CoVs. =P

, just to be sure.

Im saving my vote for later…

Note that everyone who wants to vote AGAINST will likely do so immediately, and everyone who wants to vote FOR will likely wait. Beware, o fellow AGAINSTS, lest ye fall into complacency.

Also, I would point out to the FORs that, if someone else ninjas you, you have nothing to lose by then changing your vote to AGAINST.

It’s more a reverse-ninja than anything else.

Chronos gets an unfair advantage by having an implicit FOR to start off, incidentally.

@Pavitra: What fors?

ais - chronous cannot gain if this passes as it implies other people vote FOR after him

@Soviet: He already has an implicit FOR. He can gain from a second, explicit FOR.

S-K