a) This is an improper use of a CfJ
b) There isn’t a paradox. They can still be nominated, they just can’t actually be sent out.

The issue is, what happens when the Voting Event ends and someone with Immunity would otherwise be Voted Out? Is the other Nominated Contestant Out? Or is no one Out?

And this is a proper use of CfJ; CfJs are intended to clarify ambiguity, and the rules certainly are ambiguous on this point.

But no ambiguity was expressed. You are just cheating the system to get three proposals in.

The rule set clearly states “immunity means you cannot become out”. Thus even if someone is supposed to become out, they cannot become out. So no one becomes out. I fail to even see the ambiguity.

What would be achieved by me trying to cheat the system for this rule? I’m trying to help, man, please stop accusing me of things.

To reiterate, the ambiguity is, “What happens if someone losing a Voting Event has Immunity?”

The question is, “Is the next person in line in the Voting Event Out?”

The answer is, “It doesn’t seem to be clear, let’s CfJ it into something that isn’t ambiguous.”

as per Clucky

Why would the next person in line be out? Nothing in the rules says they should be. You have realized that someone with immunity might get nominated and thus no one will be out, you want to speed the game along, and you are out of proposals to do so which. So you resort to a CfJ

I don’t know what happens! The rules say that someone becomes Out and they also say that said someone cannot become Out! Maybe your own interpretation is obvious to you, it is not obvious to me.

I couldn’t care less about this issue other than trying to clarify ambiguity. With any luck, the Final Showdown will occur soon, making it a moot point as to whether one is In or Out. Further, I get my next slot back in 4 hours! If I had a self-interest in the case (which I don’t so I don’t know why you’re accusing me), I could wait until then and Propose this.

The rules also state stuff like “outsiders cannot change their location” and “you may change your location at anytime” and there is no ambiguity there.

It is a generally accepted use of CfJs to try to fix contradictions in the Ruleset.

But there isn’t a contradiction.There is just you wanting to move the game along faster.

Honestly don’t care. 

It’s hardly likely to make a difference either way; I’ll wait until there’s a strong tendency and then bandwagon to get rid of the CfJ faster.

Failing 0-3, needs 8 votes against to do anything with. Any chance we could fail this as not effecting the Gamestate? It’s impossible for it to do anything, without a rules change. . . .

on the basis that this is unlikely to do anything.