Thursday, October 20, 2005

Proposal: War effects

Vetoed by Angry Grashopper, 13:00 CST on 10.22.05. Failed by Angry Grasshopper.

Adminned at 22 Oct 2005 12:12:54 UTC

strike “or zero if otherwise negative” from sub-rule “war”. 

Unneccessary, since the production capacities of most of the commodities are defined to be non-negative (or not defined to hold negative values, which is the same thing), and N.B. production increasing due to war seems silly to me…

Comments

gazebo_dude:

10-21-2005 00:05:33 UTC

imperial

lunaetic:

10-21-2005 00:34:56 UTC

imperial

Purplebeard:

10-21-2005 10:11:30 UTC

Actually, this doesn’t alter the production capacities, only how you treat them. Since I wasn’t sure if that value counted as a variable for the purposes of the glossary I added this for some clarity. In hindsight it was probably indeed unnecessary.

Anyway, since natural beauty is indeed a problem, and production capacitied of 0 are both very unlikely and probably irrelevant anyway,
for

smith:

10-21-2005 17:06:05 UTC

for ok

Angry Grasshopper:

10-22-2005 17:53:48 UTC

veto