Friday, January 31, 2025

We may want to patch the eligibility of Masterminds for Spy selections

I have increased by Triumphs by 2, as per the instructions in the rule “Spies {I}.”

Comments

Josh: he/they

31-01-2025 21:29:10 UTC

Naturally I remain effusive in my congratulations for ais and his team.

Brendan: he/him

31-01-2025 21:29:32 UTC

Felicitations and congratulations. And a beautiful use of the royal we.

ais523:

31-01-2025 21:33:34 UTC

I’m genuinely interested in whether people think this is broken or not. Having the Mastermind as a spy didn’t feel particularly more powerful than having an arbitrary other member of the team; and although it puts both the vetos on the same team, it can only do that when the other team has the numbers to vote things down (because a team needs to be significantly smaller than the other to get a Spy; with only a 2-member difference you just get the free Focus).

It was originally a mistake in the proposal, though, not something that I intended to happen.

Brendan: he/him

31-01-2025 21:35:59 UTC

It’s very broken, not just because players depend on Mastermind to organize and lead a team by default, but in particular because of agendas and Oversight.

Habanero:

31-01-2025 22:43:10 UTC

Congratulations again to Team Credit! We are all very impressed by your purchase of our Mastermind. Hopefully you can manage to instate your new world order soon

You must be registered and logged in to post comments.