Friday, January 31, 2025

We may want to patch the eligibility of Masterminds for Spy selections

I have increased by Triumphs by 2, as per the instructions in the rule “Spies {I}.”

Comments

Josh: he/they

31-01-2025 21:29:10 UTC

Naturally I remain effusive in my congratulations for ais and his team.

Brendan: he/him

31-01-2025 21:29:32 UTC

Felicitations and congratulations. And a beautiful use of the royal we.

ais523: Custodian

31-01-2025 21:33:34 UTC

I’m genuinely interested in whether people think this is broken or not. Having the Mastermind as a spy didn’t feel particularly more powerful than having an arbitrary other member of the team; and although it puts both the vetos on the same team, it can only do that when the other team has the numbers to vote things down (because a team needs to be significantly smaller than the other to get a Spy; with only a 2-member difference you just get the free Focus).

It was originally a mistake in the proposal, though, not something that I intended to happen.

Brendan: he/him

31-01-2025 21:35:59 UTC

It’s very broken, not just because players depend on Mastermind to organize and lead a team by default, but in particular because of agendas and Oversight.

Habanero:

31-01-2025 22:43:10 UTC

Congratulations again to Team Credit! We are all very impressed by your purchase of our Mastermind. Hopefully you can manage to instate your new world order soon