I nominate zorkmids.

If that last sentence implies that I get another nomination:  blingbuxx

I nominate “X units”.

I nominate spam, once again. 

I nominate fame.

I nominate zorkmids.

We’ve got enough stats.

I nominate “We’ve got enough stats.”

I nominate Fame

I nominate “I nominate”

I concur with SBiH and nominate “spam”

4-5-1…
This a hard fought one, ain’t it?

Just like to point out that all my vote tallies leave out the vote the sponsor is assumed to have made “for.”

Ooh, “We’ve got enough stats.” for me too.

I second (fourth?) “We’ve got enough stats”

Including mine:

6 - For
5 - Against
1 - Imperial

2 - “Zorkmids”
2 - “X units”
2 - “Spam”
2 - “Fame”
4 - “We’ve got enough stats”
1 - “I nominate”

Sorry, 7 for; I forgot alethiophile’s.

Nomination: “We’ve got enough stats”

I Nominate “We’ve got enough stats”.

I nominate “Spam”.

Though my favorite from the previous one was Simoleans.

I nominate Spam

(revote)
I nominate Spam

8-7-1.

Fame

“We’ve got enough stats”

“We’ve got enough stats”

9-10 (Doremi’s vote transfered the Imperial to the side.  so that my vote still counts as YEA.

I make it ten each way.

Spam

It’s odd. I s-ked WBMII because, though it seemed about to pass, it was going to pass with “Spam” or something similar. Now, now that Against people can vote, which was the problem most people complained about, it seems about to fail. Why the CoVs?

And the final score:
10-11…the nays have it.