Wednesday, February 07, 2007

Proposal: Wealth beyond measure IV

10-10. It has been open for voting for at least 48 hours and half (...) of its votes are FOR

Adminned at 09 Feb 2007 12:49:50 UTC

Add a new rule called “Wealth”:

Each Actor has a Wealth number tracked in the GNDT. Wealth is measured in X units.

All comments containing counted votes should also contain a nomination for the unit. The nomination that is mentioned most will replace “X units” when this Proposal is enacted. If there is a tie, the winner is decided at the discretion of the Investor. Finally, those who voted against can vote on the unit of currency.

Comments

Hix: Idle

07-02-2007 20:33:22 UTC

against I nominate zorkmids.

If that last sentence implies that I get another nomination:  blingbuxx

spikebrennan: Idle

07-02-2007 20:35:08 UTC

for I nominate “X units”.

snowballinhell7001: Idle

07-02-2007 20:41:54 UTC

I nominate spam, once again.  for

Elias IX: Idle

07-02-2007 21:22:30 UTC

against I nominate fame.

Angry Grasshopper: Idle

07-02-2007 21:25:51 UTC

for

I nominate zorkmids.

Kevan: he/him

07-02-2007 21:34:41 UTC

against We’ve got enough stats.

Josh: Imperator he/they

07-02-2007 21:43:04 UTC

against I nominate “We’ve got enough stats.”

ChinDoGu: Idle

07-02-2007 21:50:31 UTC

against I nominate Fame

Clucky: he/himIdle

07-02-2007 22:13:21 UTC

imperial I nominate “I nominate”

Edometheus: Idle

07-02-2007 22:44:47 UTC

for
I concur with SBiH and nominate “spam”

snowballinhell7001: Idle

07-02-2007 22:48:08 UTC

4-5-1…
This a hard fought one, ain’t it?

snowballinhell7001: Idle

07-02-2007 22:50:39 UTC

Just like to point out that all my vote tallies leave out the vote the sponsor is assumed to have made “for.”

peacefulwarrior: Idle

07-02-2007 23:22:05 UTC

for Ooh, “We’ve got enough stats.” for me too.

Tiberias: Idle

08-02-2007 02:00:26 UTC

for I second (fourth?) “We’ve got enough stats”

Including mine:

6 - For
5 - Against
1 - Imperial

2 - “Zorkmids”
2 - “X units”
2 - “Spam”
2 - “Fame”
4 - “We’ve got enough stats”
1 - “I nominate”

Tiberias: Idle

08-02-2007 02:01:33 UTC

Sorry, 7 for; I forgot alethiophile’s.

ChronosPhaenon: Idle

08-02-2007 02:49:31 UTC

for Nomination: “We’ve got enough stats”

The Doctor: Idle

08-02-2007 15:13:40 UTC

for

I Nominate “We’ve got enough stats”.

Cosmologicon: Idle

08-02-2007 17:37:28 UTC

against I nominate “Spam”.

Though my favorite from the previous one was Simoleans.

Doremi: Idle

08-02-2007 21:56:50 UTC

against I nominate Spam

Hix: Idle

08-02-2007 22:00:18 UTC

against (revote)
I nominate Spam

alethiophile: Idle

08-02-2007 22:23:11 UTC

8-7-1.

Amnistar: he/himIdle

09-02-2007 00:18:27 UTC

against Fame

viewtyjoe: Idle

09-02-2007 03:13:47 UTC

for
“We’ve got enough stats”

Excalabur: Idle

09-02-2007 06:30:47 UTC

against “We’ve got enough stats”

snowballinhell7001: Idle

09-02-2007 15:18:44 UTC

9-10 (Doremi’s vote transfered the Imperial to the against side.  for so that my vote still counts as YEA.

Josh: Imperator he/they

09-02-2007 15:19:01 UTC

I make it ten each way.

Clucky: he/himIdle

09-02-2007 16:34:52 UTC

imperial Spam

alethiophile: Idle

09-02-2007 16:56:45 UTC

It’s odd. I s-ked WBMII because, though it seemed about to pass, it was going to pass with “Spam” or something similar. Now, now that Against people can vote, which was the problem most people complained about, it seems about to fail. Why the CoVs?

snowballinhell7001: Idle

09-02-2007 20:32:09 UTC

And the final score:
10-11…the nays have it.