Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Proposal: Well I Never

Reaches quorum and passes 5-0 -Larrytheturtle

Adminned at 18 Apr 2013 16:08:35 UTC

Add to the rule entitled “Dignity”:

A Noble with a Dignity of 25 or less is a Scoundrel.

If there is a rule entitled “Casi Belli”, append the following to it:

* Joining a Side which has a Scoundrel as the Wronged Party is Outrageous.
* It is always Proper and never Outrageous to declare a Feud upon a Scoundrel. This overrides the above.

In “Obtainment”, after each instance of “that is not Abeyant and not held by them”, add “or a Scoundrel”.


Clucky: he/him

17-04-2013 19:19:09 UTC

for but aren’t all Lancaster bloody scoundrels?

RaichuKFM: she/her

17-04-2013 20:27:18 UTC

imperial Because this may make it so declaring a Feud on a non-Scoundrel is Improper. That “always” is clouding it up somewhat.


18-04-2013 01:06:33 UTC

for I don’t think it’s ambiguous.

RaichuKFM: she/her

18-04-2013 01:08:16 UTC

To clarify, I mean if it weren’t for that always it would as I wrote, but I’m not sure how to interpret it now.


18-04-2013 23:04:56 UTC