I think that this may end up as a “Annoy your opponents” Dynasty.

>>In other news today…

Oh, too funny.

You miscoutned Greek Worshippers at R’leyh. Since the Norse didn’t outnumbered them, supremacyship didn’t change.

That don’t matter either, ‘cos I’m building a new temple there…

R’leyh did change. There were 3 temples to Loki, plus 200 pilgrims from Cacaxtla and Doriath. That makes 500.

Yes, and 200 Worshippers from Chronos temples, plus 300 Pilgrims… When tied, it don’t change. The rule says:

If a Pantheon has more Worshippers in a City than any other Pantheon, any Deity may change the Dominant Pantheon of that City to become that Pantheon.

Norse Worshippers were not more than (they were equal to) Greek ones.

But it doesn’t matter anymore, since the number of temple has changed both for the Norse Pantheon and the Greek one…

Technically, since we’re using Brimstone here, there is no more R’leyh, correct?

So all this arguing is pointless unless some builds Nova R’leyh, right?

That’s my reading of Brimstone, it says nothing about the temples in the city, it says the city itself is destroyed.

Or am I missing something?

Yes, you are. He used Brimstone at Olympia. R’leyh is not a valid target for Brimstone. Only cities with temples of a unique Pantheon are…

Haha.  Thought I must’ve been.

Wow.  On reading his post again, I’m a fucking moron.  Hoo hoo.