BlogNomic: The First Dynasty of Desertfrog

That would be boring which is why I assume that most people won’t do it.

(I’m prepared to bet that a fair few players don’t even want the dynasty.)

  per Josh.

I’d rather not give an advantage to the players who wanted to be boring.

There are, of course, reasons to not vote for yourself (one of the biggest ones being that if you weren’t in the lead anyway, doing so would be a wasted vote); but I have to admit you have a point. On technical grounds, I don’t see why this is adding a new anonymous dynastic rule, rather than amending the one that already exists.

Because the existing dynastic rule isn’t even numbered or captioned (and I didn’t know whether this would change before my proposal is adminned), so this is a brute force way of addressing that.

Because this would mean that anyone who voted for themselves would have their Vote become an illegal value, which is a violation of the rules.

@spikebrennan: It should have been captioned, but was misadminned. I’ve fixed the adminning on it.

But I suggest nobody votes for someone who has voted for himself.

CoV per patch

Sorry, that was my fault for misadminning, I got distracted by the whitespace at the bottom of the ruleset.

I enjoy that the previous use of this proposal title was also from Spike. Maybe one day you’ll get an answer.

@Kevan: the only plausible answer I’ve seen comes from Suber himself, who suggested that the only solution to the paradox was that the barber was female, and thus didn’t need her beard shaving.

  CoV

CoV for speed

Bloody hell did i miss alot

Sounds reasonable.