Saturday, December 15, 2012

Proposal: wiki, anyone?

Self-killed. Failed by Kevan.

Adminned at 16 Dec 2012 02:41:43 UTC

All text-changing and ignoring operations defined in the next paragraph ignore the next paragraph for their purpose.

If the proposal “No overstuffed GNDT” failed, ignore the text of this proposal, between [NOG_Passed] and [/NOG_Passed].
If the proposal “No overstuffed GNDT” passed, ignore the text of this proposal between [NOG_Failed] and [/NOG_Failed]
If the proposal “Free Personality Test Inside” failed, ignore the text between [FPTI_Passed] and [/FPTI_Passed] in this proposal.
If the proposal “Free Personality Test Inside” passed, but the proposal “The End is Near” failed, ignore the text between [FPTI_Passed] and [/FPTI_Passed] in this proposal.
If the proposal “Free Personality Test Inside” passed, and the proposal “The End is Near” passed, ignore the text between [FPTI_Failed] and [/FPTI_Failed] in this proposal.


[NOG_Passed]
If there is a rule entitled “Infamy”, in that rule replace

The Name and Infamy of each Cult is tracked in the Wiki page “Cults”.

with

The Infamy of each Cult is tracked in the Wiki page “Cults”.

[/NOG_Passed]

[NOG_Failed]
Create a wiki page “Cults” and blank it.
If there is a rule entitled “Infamy”, in that rule replace

The Infamy of a Cult may be tracked in the GNDT; for the purposes of this, Cults may be set up and tracked in the GNDT.

with

The Infamy of a Cult is tracked in the wiki page “Cults”

[/NOG_Failed]

[FPTI_Passed]
In the rule “Cults”, replace

The Leader and Prophecy of a Cult are tracked privately by the Auspex.

with

The Leader, Prophecy and Headquarters of a Cult are tracked privately by the Auspex. The Name of each Cult, together with other information, as specified by other rules, is tracked in the wiki page “Cults”.

[/FPTI_Passed]

[FPTI_Failed]
In the rule “Cults”, replace

The Leader and Prophecy of a Cult are tracked privately by the Auspex.

with

The Leader and Prophecy of a Cult are tracked privately by the Auspex. The Name of each Cult, together with other information, as specified by other rules, is tracked in the wiki page “Cults”.

[/FPTI_Failed]

Well, that was quite fun to write :)
This proposal is setting up a wiki page for tracking of public cult information, taking into consideration that the proposals “No overstuffed GNDT” is having an impact on that and on the “Infamy” rule.
Also, I think, the Auspex should also track the Headquarters of a Cult, so I added that to the rule “Cults”, in case the proposal “Free Personality Test Inside” should pass. (Remember, that that proposal does nothing, should the proposal “The End is Near” fail)
I hope the wording is understandable and contains no flaws I might have overseen :)

posted by Sphinx at 15 Dec 2012 15:27:42 UTC Comments (11)

Comments

Sphinx:

15-12-2012 16:08:16 UTC

Wait, that timestamp is incorrect, I just submitted that post seconds ago, why is that the case or rather, how can it be fixed?

Josh: Observer he/they

15-12-2012 16:09:53 UTC

The time is tracked from when you open the “make new post” window, not from the time of posting. It’s completely unavoidable, and to date we have gotten around it by pretending it doesn’t happening and hoping the ruleset doesn’t notice.

Josh: Observer he/they

15-12-2012 16:11:07 UTC

against Because I still prefer the info to be in the GNDT.

Igthorn:

15-12-2012 16:16:46 UTC

against

Im with Josh

Sphinx:

15-12-2012 16:23:09 UTC

Well, I think that while it stays simple, like with only storing the Infamy of Cults in the GNDT, that causes no problem, but should there be more information about the cults, it might be pretty much for the GNDT and just clearer and easier to read.

Argon14:

15-12-2012 18:55:18 UTC

for  I’m all for simplicity as a new player, its easier for me to track a wiki page

Kevan: he/him

15-12-2012 19:02:22 UTC

against I’d prefer the GNDT or just Rule 2.1. Minimising the number of tabs you need to open to browse the entire gamestate is an important thing, I think.

Purplebeard:

15-12-2012 19:15:26 UTC

against

Sphinx:

15-12-2012 19:16:30 UTC

That’s a good point, didn’t think of that…

Sphinx:

15-12-2012 19:20:18 UTC

against , still was fun to write :D

Cpt_Koen:

16-12-2012 01:24:12 UTC

against I know it’s self-killed already but I wanted to voice my opinion that the whole [STUFF_PASSED] / [STUFF_FAILED] thing could easily obfuscate some scam - I remember some C code with a lot of comments, and some apparent comments actually being code and some apparent code actually being comments; the scam was made obvious by any syntax-highlighting text editor, but I don’t have that for blognomic :)