“which result in spending negative food values between that time and the time of the passing of this CfJ.”

Nothing can result in spending negative food, because you can’t spend negative food. But it’s a bit whatever, this saves Farsight anyways.

Sure, but the argument was offered that Wild being listed as -1 could be considered as “otherwise specified” for purposes of allowing spending negatives.

Appendix: “Unless otherwise specified, only positive amounts can be spent, lost, gained, or transferred,...”

This CfJ is intended to cover all the bases, and set Farsight free (but not to legitimize any certain interpretation of those rules’ interaction).

More work on the Wild dynamics may be required.

This could be a pain to enact, but I don’t think there is another way. I’ve been avoiding making this CfJ in order to avoid triggering a free for all on food. This might prevent it.

Thanks for your consideration folks, the King’s court is clearly righteous and merciful.