Fails at 1-5, as it cannot achieve quorum -SingularByte
Adminned at 19 Mar 2023 16:07:54 UTC
Add the following rule to the ruleset, known as “Short-distance Comms”:
Any two Runners who share the same Location may privately communicate with each other as if the special case rule “No Collaboration” is not active.
Just seeing what the response to this might be. Could open up a bit of ‘paths crossing and saying hi’ sorta thing.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Comments
lendunistus: he/him
would allow people whose location is blank to speak with each other, but
Misty:
SingularByte: he/him
Trying to talk when the location is blank would be risky as anything. Unlike when you’re in a cell, you don’t get information about who you’d be able to talk to, so you’d have to arrange it in public chat.
Kevan: he/him
Seems a bad idea to pit the inactive players against the active ones, where it’s easier to coordinate on a scam if you’re not playing or are willing to drop off the grid.
Limiting communication to “Nearby” Runners would be okay.
Trapdoorspyder:
Explicit author
. This should have, in fact, been limited to ‘nearby’. That’s my bad, I didn’t realize it allowed non-active players to talk to each other.
Raven1207: he/him
lendunistus: he/him
CoV
per Woops, we were idle
SingularByte: he/him
CoV,
per lendunistus
Misty:
Habanero: