Saturday, March 18, 2023

Proposal: Woops, we were muted

Fails at 1-5, as it cannot achieve quorum -SingularByte

Adminned at 19 Mar 2023 16:07:54 UTC

Add the following rule to the ruleset, known as “Short-distance Comms”:

Any two Runners who share the same Location may privately communicate with each other as if the special case rule “No Collaboration” is not active.

Just seeing what the response to this might be. Could open up a bit of ‘paths crossing and saying hi’ sorta thing.


lendunistus: he/him

18-03-2023 04:53:19 UTC

would allow people whose location is blank to speak with each other, but


Lulu: she/her

18-03-2023 05:00:41 UTC

for the waiting room is shared by all

SingularByte: he/him

18-03-2023 05:19:46 UTC

Trying to talk when the location is blank would be risky as anything. Unlike when you’re in a cell, you don’t get information about who you’d be able to talk to, so you’d have to arrange it in public chat.


Kevan: he/him

18-03-2023 10:20:54 UTC

Seems a bad idea to pit the inactive players against the active ones, where it’s easier to coordinate on a scam if you’re not playing or are willing to drop off the grid.

Limiting communication to “Nearby” Runners would be okay.


Trapdoorspyder: he/him

18-03-2023 20:09:47 UTC

Explicit author imperial. This should have, in fact, been limited to ‘nearby’. That’s my bad, I didn’t realize it allowed non-active players to talk to each other.

Raven1207: he/they

19-03-2023 00:14:06 UTC


lendunistus: he/him

19-03-2023 10:59:52 UTC

CoV against per Woops, we were idle

SingularByte: he/him

19-03-2023 11:04:01 UTC

CoV,  against  per lendunistus

Lulu: she/her

19-03-2023 14:06:44 UTC

against cob


19-03-2023 15:21:56 UTC