BlogNomic: The First Dynasty of Desertfrog

Gracias

vetoing and voting to veto are very different

coppro, where were you when we were protoing?

Coppro: All this means is that the Leader could veto without using the icon.

RoV

“If a player votes DEFERENTIAL when their Faction has no Leader, their vote will count the same as the Critic’s Vote. If the game has no standing Critic, and their Faction has no Leader, their vote will count as an explicit Vote of abstention.”

Unneccessary.  Under the currently proposed rules there is no way for a faction not to have a leader.

“If the term “Critic” in the ruleset is replaced by another term before this CfJ passes, use that term in place of “Critic” where it appears in the altered ruletext.”

Not sure what this would do since this isn’t a CfJ.

The first… yeah, that wasn’t in my version.

The second is irrelevant, as the only chance of changing things comes before this. I’d say pass it and we’ll patch it.

I dislike how much it complicates DEF votes

If I vote DEF while kevan is my leader, he votes for, I switch amnistar being my leader and he voted Against my vote changes with no effect on the voting thread

Same with vetoing. You veto me, I swap factions, and suddenly the veto is illegal

I agree with Clucky.  I can’t see it being any better if the DEF vote was related to the faction that the player is a part of at the time of voting, either.

Nice idea, but it’s going to be tiresome to tally all the votes by hand (and we’d have to keep checking all the time, to see whether a proposal could even pass or not).

I very much like the idea but not the complications.

Per all of you guys

CoV. Blergh.