“quorum” could be a name

Can I just check the exact intended meaning of the LED Banner effect? It could be interpreted to mean “While using this system, displays the name of every distinct Operator that Bot has defeated”, or as “For each both that was defeated in a bout while this bot had this system, this system displays their name.”

The first is of course the easier of the two to achieve, so if it’s not intended, it’s a possible scam win.

(I’m of course pointing it out now instead of doing it myself since I’m currently behind several players and I doubt I’ll be the only one to spot it.)

reword this to “displays a number of Operator names equal to or more than the quorum”

[Chiiika] The rule Names in clarifications prevents quorum from being a name, since it’s not explicitly a name.

SingularByte: I *thinks* Josh meant the latter of two, but he could say for himself

Ahh, so these kinds of scams are autopatched now
CoV

@chiiika Remember that proposals can be edited in their first 4 hours unless you vote; if you have an objection please hold your vote until after the edit window.

@SB Yes, the second was the intent; I now obviously can’t change the wording so it may be worth a patch.

Josh: oh frick I forgot that exist kek sorry

seems like a rather odd win condition

CoV on second thought, I like the flavor though

I don’t like this, just wastes a hardpoint
can also be quite easily skewed by the announcer

@lendun Not without violating the rules on randomness

And the use of a hardpoint, and the high energy cost, is a feature; it’s supposed to be hard

I would still rather have a VC related to money

i’ll write up that proposal soon along with sponsors

there could be shenanigans here related to creating an account with the name “quorum” but I doubt people would go to that length

@lendus see the comments above; there are existing provisions that defend against that eventuality.

  But it’ll need the fix soon enough.