Proposal: A Better Better Wording
Reaches quorum at 11-0.
-Purplebeard
Adminned at 15 Jun 2006 02:20:20 UTC
In 1.7, ‘Gamestate Tracking’, replace the line:
If no other Monk has commented on it, an official post may be altered or removed; otherwise this can only be done as allowed by the Ruleset.
with
If no Monk has commented on it, an official post may be altered or removed; otherwise this can only be done as allowed by the Ruleset.
Tightining up some language, closing a purported loophole.
Thelonious:
Cunning indeed.
Currently, a monk could…
1. Make a proposal that was likely to time out or wait for somebody else to make a proposal that was likely to time out. This is the BLOCKER.
2. Make an innocous looking proposal but with a deliberate mis-wording. This is the CON.
3. Vote against the CON, marking it as S-K’d and pointing out the bad wording.
4. Re-propose (just to make the story look real). This is the DUMMY.
5. In all likelihood, nobody would bother to comment on the original.
6. Wait until the BLOCKER and the CON has timed out but hasn’t been admin’d yet.
7. Modify the CON (allowed because no OTHER monk has commented on it yet) to give emself victory.
8. Admin the BLOCKER and the CON and make a DoV.
Of course, this is only really open to admins because otherwise the person who came to admin the CON would probably vote against it first and it would fail 1-1.
All the same, I wish I’d spotted it myself!