Monday, December 13, 2021

Proposal: A Division of Power (Part 1)

Passes 9-1. Enacted by Brendan.

Adminned at 15 Dec 2021 17:37:01 UTC

If at least 8 of the Effective Votes on this proposal are FOR, then repeal the Perdurable Rule “Eternal Emperor”.

Might as well offer these options separately so they don’t fail together.



13-12-2021 18:53:23 UTC

Has to be a can opener to not need unanimity.


13-12-2021 18:54:05 UTC

(And the Perdurable tag.)

Jason: he/him

13-12-2021 19:00:49 UTC

It is a can opener though? It doesn’t have to be called “Can Opener” to count.

As for the tag, I think “The modification is preceded or followed immediately by an unambiguous statement of which section of the ruleset it takes place.” and “The modification specifically states a rule using its number or the name of the stated rule only occurs once in the ruleset.” are both met (and only one of them needs to be met).


13-12-2021 19:31:08 UTC

for Cool. Here’s my vote; I’ll be busy for a while.

Kevan: he/him

13-12-2021 21:32:30 UTC



13-12-2021 21:35:22 UTC


Jason: he/him

13-12-2021 21:44:23 UTC

for EAV (just to be safe)

Josh: he/him

13-12-2021 21:57:54 UTC


Brendan: he/him

13-12-2021 22:02:51 UTC

against for the moment.

Snisbo: she/they

14-12-2021 05:34:42 UTC

imperial As stated in can opener 2, I’m ambivalent towards EE

Clucky: he/him

14-12-2021 16:52:11 UTC

against I don’t really care about this rule. Sure, it breaks the game for a bit if someone who isn’t allied with Brendan wins but we can fix the game then when it happens

meanwhile, there are people voting FOR this who are voting against removing IL and I see no reason to give those players what they want until they change their votes on IL

Raven1207: he/him

15-12-2021 03:32:34 UTC


redtara: they/them

15-12-2021 14:40:21 UTC


Brendan: he/him

15-12-2021 17:36:12 UTC

for I’ve had my fun here. CoV.