Thursday, December 03, 2015

Proposal: [ambiguous]

The number of Clerks who are not voting AGAINST it is less than Quorum: 2-4. — Quirck

Adminned at 04 Dec 2015 21:02:41 UTC

If there is not a rule titled Committees, this Proposal does nothing.

Append to the end of the second paragraph of the rule Committees:

This letter/s is known as it’s Tracking Code. In the event that more than one Committee has the same Tracking Code, then, for each conflicting Committee after the first created, use the first two letters of that Committee’s Name as its Tracking Code instead. In the event that there are still conflicting Tracking Codes, repeat the process with the conflicting Committees, increasing the number of letters used until no conflicts remain.

LOOK WHOS BACK ALL OF A SUDDEN. ITS ME.

Should be able to stay up-to-date with this Dynasty.

posted by Tantusar at 03 Dec 2015 19:28:50 UTC Comments (8)

Comments

Kevan: he/him

03-12-2015 19:52:31 UTC

Welcome back!

against 26 Committees seems more than enough, though, and if the later ones need slightly ridiculous names to stay within the remaining alphabet, so much the better.

(The “Letter” of a Committee referred to by Motions probably does need to be explicitly defined somewhere, though, I managed to overlook that.)

Tantusar: he/they

03-12-2015 20:06:48 UTC

A fair point.

By the way, very nice job on the banner.

quirck: he/him

03-12-2015 20:45:24 UTC

against

Josh: he/they

03-12-2015 21:24:16 UTC

LOOK WHOS BACK

Is it Shady?

for because in practice were probably not going to get Q or Z committees, and contouring committee names to stay within this restriction doesn’t seem that interesting as a mechanic.

RaichuKFM: she/her

04-12-2015 02:10:05 UTC

for Yeah, I don’t really see the harm.

Kevan: he/him

04-12-2015 11:03:55 UTC

Creative constraints! I think we got more mileage out of adding mechanics to an actual Tarot deck, last dynasty, than we would have if we were just making up any old cards.

And I’d be surprised if we ended up with more than a dozen Committees here, really.

archon:

04-12-2015 14:13:59 UTC

against creative constraints. i agree that it is unlikly that more than twenty six committees. (and the last few should have fun names and domains).

Murphy:

04-12-2015 16:41:49 UTC

against same reasons as the others