Friday, August 07, 2020

Proposal: Annoyingness Bonus

Fewer than a quorum not voting against. Failed 1 vote to 5 by Kevan.

Adminned at 07 Aug 2020 15:48:23 UTC

Passively, each Gambler with Annoyingness has X number of points (Where “X” is the number of other Gamblers with at least 1 Annoyingness)

posted by Raven1207 at 07 Aug 2020 05:57:00 UTC Comments (5)

Comments

Josh: he/they

07-08-2020 07:17:11 UTC

against This proposal doesn’t do anything.

If you need any help formatting your proposals such that they have the intended effect then please do reach out, either by requesting a mentor or on slack.

Kevan: he/him

07-08-2020 07:35:20 UTC

Even if taken as “enact a rule with this text”, this seems to be saying that everyone’s Points are passively locked at 8 (since we all have Annoyingness).

Reading it as “each Gambler with Annoyingness above zero” still means locking six players in with a score of 5 - which is great for me, as my Annoyingness is zero, but it’s not going to get a quorum of votes of support.

against

Lulu: she/her

07-08-2020 09:20:06 UTC

against

Publius Scribonius Scholasticus: he/they

07-08-2020 13:58:39 UTC

against

derrick: he/him

07-08-2020 15:15:26 UTC

against