Monday, February 08, 2021

Proposal: [Appendix] Explicit Priority

Times out 2-2. Failed by Brendan.

Adminned at 11 Feb 2021 01:03:36 UTC

In the Appendix rule “Prioritisation”, add the following step to the start of the numbered list and renumber the others accordingly:

When one part of the rules says another part takes precedence over it, the rule not yielding precedence takes precedence.

Comments

Raven1207: he/they

09-02-2021 02:12:28 UTC

for

Clucky: he/him

09-02-2021 08:06:48 UTC

What had happened recently that indicates we need this change?

Josh: Observer he/they

09-02-2021 08:53:37 UTC

I’m also curious what problem this is solving

pokes:

09-02-2021 12:57:30 UTC

against this makes me fairly nervous.

Darknight: he/him

09-02-2021 13:11:36 UTC

against

Bucky:

09-02-2021 17:15:12 UTC

@Josh the problem is that the appendix rules on precedence themselves take precedence over any claims of precedence in dynastic rules.

There is no way for dynastic rules to declare that one takes precedence over the other.

pokes:

09-02-2021 20:54:03 UTC

That can be fixed by putting this lower on the list than #1