Friday, October 01, 2010

Proposal: But This is Only Half the List

Reaches quorum at 9-3 and is Enacted. - lilomar

Adminned at 03 Oct 2010 13:43:33 UTC

Give Rule 2.2.1 the title “Imposters.”

Add a new Subrule to Rule 2.2, entitled “Codename Tracking,” and give it the following text:

Codenames may have their own entries in the GNDT, as if they were Agents.  Any Agent may update the Description or Last Known Location of a Codename at any time, but only the D-Ops may add new Codenames.

At any time, if a number of Agents greater than or equal to Quorum has confirmed Codenames, the D-Ops may add any number of these Codenames (including those assigned to Imposters, if they wish) to the GNDT.  At any time, if at least three Codenames are tracked in the GNDT but no longer assigned to any Agent or Imposter, the D-Ops may remove any number of these expired Codenames from the GNDT.

In addition, if “Fledgling Allegiance” passes, append the following paragraph to “Codename Tracking:”

Any time an Agent’s Allegiance changes, the D-Ops may secretly change the Codename assigned to an Imposter (if any) with the Agent’s previous Allegiance.

A potential next step would be to allow Agents to blow one another’s cover, if their Description and LKL match a Codename’s.


Ienpw III:

10-02-2010 01:58:00 UTC

against for the sake of keeping the GNDT clutter free. A wiki page, perhaps?

Darknight: HE/HIM

10-02-2010 02:55:33 UTC



10-02-2010 03:11:43 UTC

imperial I’m not sure of what to think.


10-02-2010 05:06:53 UTC


Josh: HE/HIM

10-02-2010 06:12:17 UTC

for It would be interesting to get rid of all of the “normal” names from the GNDT and just have one for codenames.


10-02-2010 08:21:53 UTC


Kevan: HE/HIM

10-02-2010 09:37:28 UTC

for And seconding Josh, so long as we’re careful it doesn’t turn into a game of picking apart people’s online times to work out who they are.


10-02-2010 13:15:45 UTC

for I especially like the part that their is a certain punishment for changing one’s Allegiance.


10-03-2010 05:00:40 UTC



10-03-2010 16:42:35 UTC


Thane Q:

10-03-2010 20:12:16 UTC