Jeez, that looks much longer in fully rendered form than it did in the raw HTML. 
(EAV)

Sounds interesting. Don’t know what the 24 hour reference means, though- can you prevent or delay a proposal’s enactment by buying a For vote?

Delay.  The aim is to avoid a smallish cabal getting together and quoruming something up with only three people.  24 hours is long enough that everyone in the game can look at it once, and express their opinion (even via spending Points on a veto, if they feel that strongly).

As I read it, “No proposal shall be enacted if votes have been bought thereupon for 24 hours after its posting” means that if anyone buys votes on a proposal during its first 24 hours pending, the proposal can’t ever be enacted.  Therefore, 

Ahh, misplaced modifiers.

Per Bucky

What?  that’s not what that sentence means at all!  “for 24 hours after its posting” is subordinate to the entire first half of the sentence.

No proposal shall be enatcted (if votes have been bought thereupon) for 24 hours after its posting. 

Is how it was intended to parse, and is a perfectly valid interpretation of the sentence.  As its the way that makes the game NOT BREAK, how about we use that one?  (also, the other one can’t make someone win, so if someone wants to argue that the game should break we can have a CfJ…)

No proposal [singular] shall be enatcted (if votes [plural] have been bought thereupon) for 24 hours after its [singular] posting.

I can only conclude that the singular pronoun refers to the singular noun.

On further reflection, even without the wording issue, this proposal would probably slow the game down quite a bit, so I would still be AGIANST.

Per odd sentence and game-slowing. Just the veto would be good, though.

Yeah, i may go for the /fourth/ round of this proposal with just hte framework and hte veto and let people figure it out from there. 

I really like this idea, but I can’t seem to make it work.

Yes, the framework seems fine, but just skip the 24 hour part. Perhaps instead, Players are require to purchase votes only in the first 24 hours of that proposal?

Doesn’t help: the problem is people runnign stuff through the queue before other people can see it.  I’d actually put it in the other way, then. 

I’ll likely re-prop the framework and the veto and make other people add other sub-rules.