(abstaining, before anyone asks)

but only because “sheeps” is ugly ^_^

How hard is it to say “any one or more Sheep”?

It’s not, but there are currently proposals that simply say “any Sheep”, which is ambiguous.

Personally I really don’t care, as long as we all agree one way or another at the start so it doesn’t become a problem later.

and sheep as a word counts as both the singular and plural, at least in the US anyway.

Clarity is good.

I like the word “sheeps”

yay “sheeps!”

Moutons! =D

Make it clear in the rule. This will probably cause more confusion.

“any player” by default would refer to all players, so why is “any sheep” different from “sheep”?

And it would only be fitting thematically for this dynasty to be won by a scam based around the the bureaucracy of the word “sheep”...

Darknight: that’s almost “woooosh”-worthy.

Although I might vote for ‘sheepies’ as an alternative.

This may be a bit silly, but it’s a good way to avoid potential problems and to pursue a clarification.

@Travis: For future note: you don’t need to type “Call For Judgement:” at the beginning of the title, like with Proposals, the blog software takes care of it.

Oops, I cut and pasted the title from the last one.

CoV now that I think of it.

@Darth Cliche:  What does CoV mean, if you don’t mind my asking?

Change of Vote, isn’t it?

Yes.
The Blognomic Jargon Page is rather useful when trying to figure out various TLA’s we use.

Ironically, TLA is not one of the TLA’s defined on that page.

:P