Players use Spivak anyway, so IMHO we should at least put Spivak back into the glossary so new players at least know what it is.

it doesn’t need to be in the glossary any more than other terms that are defined in the dictionary need to be.

The reason for removing it isn’t just because its not defined. Its that I personally like Spivak and think its stupid to allow admins to remove it. If you are going to do that, you should have a required set of pronouns for use.

Then if you’re going to remove the phrase, add something to the glossary so there is not ambiguity as to whether you can use them or not.

Also, as for the second part: It might be better worded as “the Ascension Address that follows” instead of “that DoV’s Ascension Address”, but the phrase should not be taken out completely.

Aside from which, if someone leaves, it’s a simple CfJ to deal with it, I’d rather the CfJ be used in this issue than have the rules allow someone to freeze the game.

But anyone can freeze the game. We could double the ruleset preventing jerks from abusing it. I’d rather keep it as simple as possible and trust the members to be respectful of the ruleset.

Yoda—why wouldn’t we be able to use it? The ruleset doesn’t enumerate everything we can do. Its not like the ruleset says “Here is the dictionary of words you are allowed to post”.

COV