Monday, June 07, 2010

Proposal: Clean up that messy GNDT

Vetoed procedurally -Darth

Adminned at 07 Jun 2010 13:21:46 UTC

Add a sub-rule to rule 2.1 “RNG-Man” entitled “Non-@‘s not allowed.” with the text:

The RNG does not have a row in the GNDT.

This shouldn’t stop him from being a @, as I read the ruleset. But it will keep us from having to track all the——-‘s in his columns. This should only be a problem if a core rule is created that specifies something that should be tracked in the gndt, or if a dynastic rule specifies that the RNG is to be tracked as well.

posted by lilomar at 07 Jun 2010 14:11:45 UTC Comments (5)

Comments

Put:

07-06-2010 14:31:56 UTC

imperial
I don’t really care. I just ignored it in the previous dynasties.

Bucky:

07-06-2010 15:03:36 UTC

against

ais523:

07-06-2010 15:25:49 UTC

against Last time we tried this (IIRC in my first dynasty, might have been the second), we found that such a change prevented the person without a row in the GNDT from being able to change it. As a result, it’s best to leave the row there for that reason.

lilomar:

07-06-2010 15:28:20 UTC

oh, gotcha.
against s/k’d due to a limitation in the GNDT software.

Klisz:

07-06-2010 20:21:17 UTC

veto procedural