Would upvote, going to wait though.

So skeletons will be useful, but micronium will not (except for state morphing).  But you’re right, the amount of nutrients we can get from a reef now is pretty pitiful since Massive Appetite.  We’ll come up with something else for micronium to do.

Because its locked now anyways.

Seems good to me.

It’s unfortunately locked but:

This
“a terrain feature may be said to “supply” a type of nutrient.

Brine Pools supply Gonium. Vents supply Miconium”

May actually not exist in the ruleset, because of the Micronium CfJ. So it wouldn’t be there to remove.

Since I don’t know what would happen when a passes proposal attempts something impossible:

CoV

a passed proposal*

I thought about that, but since your CFJs specify that “Miconium” and “Micronium” are synonymous (retroactively, even!) I think we’re ok.

Besides, nothing breaks if we fail to remove that part of the rule.  The same information will just be stated twice now.

Yes, but if that passes before this one, then the quote

“a terrain feature may be said to “supply” a type of nutrient.

Brine Pools supply Gonium. Vents supply Miconium”

Actually doesn’t exist. This one:

“a terrain feature may be said to “supply” a type of nutrient.

Brine Pools supply Gonium. Vents supply Micronium”

Would exist. And the retroactiveness changes all past instances, it doesn’t protect against any future ones, like this one could be if it passes after my CfJ.

As part of the CfJ we agree that Miconium and Micronium are synonymous, and as such I’d think “Vents supply Miconium” and “Vents supply Micronium” are synonymous, and so on, up to a whole paragraph involving one or the other.

If an admin did the replacement regardless, would anyone raise a CfJ about it?

On the grounds of keeping things interesting. Eating with the beak is actually more lucrative than eating with the stomach, the stomach is just continually on alert.

Because this game has too much stuff.

[pokes] The ruleset only clarifies this for proposals (“Once a proposal has been enacted, it can have no further direct effect on the gamestate.”), but the same should go for CfJs. It would be unfair to have a conspiratorial CfJ of “victory and toast are synonyms from now on” and for one of us to use that to win three years from now, against players who’d never seen it.

“Miconium” in this proposal is now an obvious typo for “Micronium”, though, and can be corrected by the proposer at any time.

Miconium has been changed to Micronium in the proposal.