Wednesday, November 09, 2011

Proposal: Cruel Patron Clarity

Vetoed. -coppro

Adminned at 10 Nov 2011 14:17:21 UTC

The following text exists in the ruleset:

A Player listed under another Penniless Player’s Employment is known as a that Player’s Cruel Patron.

Replace it with:

A Player listed under a Penniless Player’s Employment is known as that Player’s Cruel Patron.

 

This is to avoid any CfJ’s relating to raids being invalid due to raiding a penniless player who’s employee cannot be called a Cruel Patron since they are not also penniless.

Comments

Spitemaster:

10-11-2011 00:20:55 UTC

for

southpointingchariot:

10-11-2011 00:47:58 UTC

seems like it could be handled by “Admins may correct obvious spelling and typographical mistakes in the Ruleset at any time”

ChronosPhaenon:

10-11-2011 01:05:07 UTC

for

Pavitra:

10-11-2011 02:28:41 UTC

against per southpointingchariot; also, “The following text exists in the ruleset.”

scshunt:

10-11-2011 16:18:08 UTC

veto