Thursday, November 19, 2020

Proposal: Cyan Is So 1104 A.D.

Timed out and failed, 3 votes to 3. Josh

Adminned at 21 Nov 2020 16:13:37 UTC

To “Pigments”, add:-

A Pigment is Unnecessary if its name appears in no other dynastic rules, there are no Tiles of that Pigment’s Colour, and if its Colour is not part of any Monk’s Desideratum. If they have not done so in the past 72 hours, the Abbot should select a secretly random Unnecessary Pigment (if any exist) and remove it from this rule.

Comments

Josh: POINDEXTER HE/HIM

11-19-2020 12:02:04 UTC

Destroys some hidden information by collapsing possibility space?

Kevan: HE/HIM

11-19-2020 12:24:59 UTC

Also nudges Monks to choose a Desiderata if they haven’t already.

Josh: POINDEXTER HE/HIM

11-19-2020 13:48:07 UTC

against

Clucky: HE/HIM

11-19-2020 16:42:17 UTC

against

in theory someone could go idle and come back to their Desiderata being illegal. I’d rather find some other way to collapse the possibility space.

Kevan: HE/HIM

11-19-2020 16:54:06 UTC

Blanking an idler’s illegal Desideratum doesn’t seem that bad: they get to choose a new one, and the colour they lost was one that was scoring zero on the Mosaic.

Clucky: HE/HIM

11-19-2020 17:38:09 UTC

Would it get blanked? I suppose it would, as it is no longer a list of three colors.

Aren’t there worries about how this would interact with natural colors?

Kevan: HE/HIM

11-19-2020 17:43:03 UTC

It would get blanked. When a Monk unidles, “if a [gamestate] value is invalid, does not exist, or the Monk Idled in a different Dynasty [...] the Monk is given the default value for new Monks”.

Problems with Natural Colours are avoided with the phrase “its name appears in no other dynastic rules”, unless I’m missing an angle on that.

Raven1207: HE/HIM

11-19-2020 20:25:58 UTC

for

Bucky:

11-20-2020 03:18:18 UTC

against

robotabc773: HE/HIM

11-21-2020 00:10:12 UTC

for