Friday, February 10, 2023

Proposal: Di5VT5PzH1Y

Times out 1-5 and fails -SingularByte

Adminned at 13 Feb 2023 08:19:02 UTC

If the phrase “spend that Route’s Length in Time to set their Location to the Location named in that Route.” exists in the rule “Locations” then reword that phrase to

spend that Route’s Length in Time to set their Location to the Location named in that Route, unless the number of Villagers who have that Location already equals or exceeds the Location’s Capacity.

Add the following to the list of Found Items:

* Nothing
* Nothing
* Nothing
* Nothing
* Nothing
* Nothing

If there is any Location such that a number of Villagers greater than that Location’s Capacity have it set to be their Location, then randomly select a Villager from the set of Villagers with that Location, and change their Location to be Village Square (or Outside if there is no Location called Village Square); repeat this process until there are no Locations which qualify.

Comments

Josh: Observer he/they

10-02-2023 19:13:52 UTC

Aw you spoiled it

JonathanDark: he/him

10-02-2023 19:16:49 UTC

There goes my plan to set my Heat in polar coordinates.

Brendan: he/him

10-02-2023 20:15:23 UTC

(Kevan made the last clause of this proposal redundant by updating Fahrenheit 450.9, so I edited it to kick people out of overcrowded places instead.)

SingularByte: he/him

10-02-2023 22:40:53 UTC

I’d have preferred if this kicked out the late-comers, rather than just random players.

Habanero:

10-02-2023 23:45:26 UTC

imperial

Darknight: he/him

11-02-2023 04:45:32 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

11-02-2023 10:22:27 UTC

against We can do something more interesting than a simple real-time race to react to each new or vacated Location.

Trapdoorspyder: he/him

12-02-2023 05:39:35 UTC

against

JonathanDark: he/him

12-02-2023 08:15:18 UTC

against