Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Proposal: Digging deeper

Reached quorum 5-0, enacted by Kevan and since Case 36 is still open “the rest of this Proposal has no effect”.

Adminned at 15 Jan 2019 16:36:57 UTC

If Case 36 has not been closed, the rest of this Proposal has no effect.

If Case 36 has been closed: In “Cases”, replace:

* For each Party in the Case whose Attorney made a comment on the Case’s blog post which included a FOR icon, decrease that Party’s Guilt for this Case by 2 (to a minimum of zero) and decrease that Attorney’s Money by $2,000 (to a minimum of zero).
* For each Party in the Case whose Attorney made a comment on the Case’s blog post which included an AGAINST icon, increase the other Party’s Guilt for this Case by 1 and decrease that Attorney’s Integrity by 1 (to a minimum of zero).

with:

* For each FOR icon within a comment on the Case’s blog post made by a Party’s Attorney, decrease that Party’s Guilt for this Case by 1 (to a minimum of zero). Decrease that Attorney’s money (to a minimum of zero) by n times $1,000 for the n-th FOR icon: $1,000 for the first FOR icon, $2,000 for the second FOR icon, and so on.
* For each AGAINST icon within a comment on the Case’s blog post made by a Party’s Attorney: if that Attorney’s integrity is above 0, increase the other Party’s Guilt for this Case by 1 and decrease that Attorney’s Integrity by 1.

posted by pokes at 15 Jan 2019 04:03:00 UTC Comments (4)

Comments

Trigon:

15-01-2019 04:42:05 UTC

for I like the AGAINST stacking quite a bit. I’m unsure how to feel about the FOR stacking, but if this passes, I’ll probably just not use it.

Zaphod:

15-01-2019 05:02:17 UTC

for

edelopo:

15-01-2019 06:39:11 UTC

for

Kevan: he/him

15-01-2019 09:02:29 UTC

for