Sunday, June 29, 2025

Proposal: Dishonest Rivalry

Fewer than a quorum not voting AGAINST. Failed 1 votes to 4 AGAINST+REVISE with an Imperial DEF, by Kevan.

Adminned at 30 Jun 2025 13:54:18 UTC

In the dynastic rule “Scoring”, change

Wordsmiths are strongly encouraged to include the reasons why they chose the number that they did in their Scoring unless it’s on their Rival’s Backronym. A Scoring should reflect how much the commenter likes the Backronym (or the fact that it’s their Rival’s Backronym), and how well they think it fits the Prompt (if the Prompt is not blank).

No mechanical change, just conforming the recommendations to the practical requirements of having a Rival.

Comments

Kevan: he/him

29-06-2025 20:02:47 UTC

arrow No mechanical change indeed, you haven’t specified what you’re changing to this.

Josh: he/they

29-06-2025 21:30:31 UTC

against I wouldn’t vote for the change that this is intending to make while Infamy, Infamy is pending.

JonathanDark: Puzzler he/him

29-06-2025 23:24:09 UTC

imperial

Trapdoorspyder: he/him

30-06-2025 05:06:13 UTC

arrow As it just doesn’t work in the current form

Darknight: he/him

30-06-2025 10:32:20 UTC

arrow