Thursday, June 24, 2010

Proposal: Dynastic Fix

Self-killed. Josh

Adminned at 26 Jun 2010 05:08:48 UTC

Amend Rule 1.8 by making the first paragraph read:

BlogNomic is divided into a number of Dynasties. Each Dynasty is headed by a single @, known as the RNG. The first RNG of a dynasty is its Progenitor; a dynasty is named for its Progenitor according to the number of Dynasties its Progenitor has headed (eg. “The First Dynasty of Myke”).

 

We’re technically in a dynasty of Bucky right now, which does seem wrong.

Comments

Galdyn: Idle

24-06-2010 11:47:42 UTC

for

lilomar: Idle

24-06-2010 13:56:51 UTC

imperial

Rodney: Idle

24-06-2010 14:16:18 UTC

for This is essentially what we’re already doing.

redtara: they/themIdle

24-06-2010 14:20:33 UTC

for

Hix: Idle

24-06-2010 14:54:04 UTC

Is this really the right way?  Bucky’s previous Dynasty was “The Third”.  This Dynasty is would be named after DC (which is fine).  Bucky’s next Dynasty would then be “The Fifth Dynasty of Bucky”.

If that’s what you want, vote FOR.  But I think it’s silly to skip a number. against

lilomar: Idle

24-06-2010 15:02:36 UTC

CoV -> against per Hix

Kyre: Idle

24-06-2010 15:30:49 UTC

imperial

Bucky: Idle

24-06-2010 16:12:39 UTC

against

Freezerbird: Idle

24-06-2010 16:45:51 UTC

against something like “according to the number of times its Progenitor has previously been a Progenitor” might be better.

Rodney: Idle

24-06-2010 17:02:47 UTC

against CoV per Hix.

Galdyn: Idle

24-06-2010 20:34:00 UTC

against  CoV per Hix

scshunt: Idle

24-06-2010 21:22:45 UTC

against self-kill per the ever-vigilant Hix.

Darknight: he/him

25-06-2010 02:52:47 UTC

And thats why its good to have Hix around.