Proposal: Fit to Print
Add a new rule named “Rating” with the following text:
Each Drafter has a number named Rating which is a derived value using the following formula, where any scores referred to in the formula are among all Reviews meant for that Drafter:
Rating = (Median value of all Mechanics scores + Median value of all Theme scores + Median value of all Style scores) x Number of Mandates in that Drafter’s Claims
The start of determining which Drafters have the top Plans. Eventually we will probably want a way to lock this in, or perhaps vet the Claims since right now they are up to each Drafter to determine.
ais523: Supervisor
I’ve been considering adding a way for Drafters to challenge Claims that they think are wrong (similar to a CFJ, but based on whether the voters believe the claim is correct rather than on whether they think the person who made the claim truly believes it) – that would mesh well with this proposal. But I haven’t gotten around to writing up rules wording for that yet.