Proposal: Hanoi Halting Problem
Passes 10-0. Enacted by Brendan.
Adminned at 31 Mar 2023 18:39:58 UTC
If there exists ruletext reading “As a Daily Action, if the Building has not collapsed, a Engineer may Build” then reword it as follows:
As a Daily Action, if the Building is not Collapsed, a Engineer may Build
If there exists ruletext reading “If Building Stability is 0 or lower, the building has collapsed! If the building has collapsed, then any Engineer can Move On.” then reword it as follows:
If Building Stability is 0 or lower, then the Building is Collapsed; otherwise, the Building is not Collapsed. While the Building is Collapsed, any Engineer can Move On.
Comments
Misty: she/her
I’m not sure where I screwed up the wording?
Brendan: he/him
Under the current wording, once the building has collapsed the first time, anyone can Move On infinite times.
Misty: she/her
Might want to fix the “is/has” issue with the other place where it appears in the proposal, then
Brendan: he/him
Good call, done.
Josh: Ascendant he/they
Habanero:
JonathanDark: he/him
jjm3x3: he/him
Misty: she/her
Trapdoorspyder: he/him
SingularByte: he/him
Kevan: he/him
Raven1207: he/him