Failed 3-6 -Amnistar
Adminned at 02 Apr 2007 14:12:41 UTC
Rewrite the main part of rule Evolution, so it reads:
There exists a wiki page entitled [[The Creature Page]] which contains information about lifeforms. Each lifeform is given one entry on “The Creature Page†which contains the lifeform’s name and any evolutionary variables currently being tracked.
Doesn’t that just entirely remove the part about requiring unique names? Creature names really shouldn’t be the same…
I’ll be reposting my original changes as trivial.
I think that there should be a clause pertaining to the changing of a creature’s name.
Seebo, Axeling: This Proposal completely does away with Creature Names. A good idea, I think, considering the headaches they seem to be causing.
If you want the flavor of Creature Names, I suppose nothing stops you from writing one into a description (which would not be part of the Gamestate, of course).
Does anybody have an idea about how to make the creature names important?
Oh yeah, I don’t like Creature Names. The only use I could see is if we controlled more than one creature.
CoV
I’ll leave it up to Clucky if we want to keep creature names or no.
I thought I had voted
I like creature names. They may serve a purpose eventually.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
Clucky: he/him
How could two Giant Spaghetti Moths be totally different?