There’s not much to say here except sorry to ais that we couldn’t make this more interesting. I think we got too invested in the rhythm and then by the time some of us made headway, it was too late to change without undoing that progress.

I’m holding my vote to give darknight and Raven a chance to argue for any portion of the chop while the edit window is still open.

I’m holding my vote for the same reason.

I’m ok with either of you winning because there’s no way I’m going to catch up and it was clever planning.

I’ll vote for this in exchange for a 10% share of the chop.

Brendan.

An Idle Seeker may post or vote on a Votable Matter provided that its effect is entirely limited to amending the non-dynastic ruleset

This would not be amending any part of the ruleset, thus not eligible for Recusants to vote on.

Yes but there’s no hiatus so there’s nothing to stop anyone from unidling to hold the game to ransom.

(Please don’t.)

This is good for you Josh, you invariably win the roll when I’m in the chop

I’m willing to unidle to counter-vote any shenanigans. A dynasty’s winner should be decided by its active players.

(Though I recognise that it’s probably tongue in cheek.)

I can’t for the life of me figure out how to amend the rule to prevent it.

SB, I’ll give you 49% of my 10% to stay quiet