Wednesday, February 01, 2023

Proposal: Home Stretch

Withdrawn. — Quirck

Adminned at 02 Feb 2023 16:04:09 UTC

Enact a new Dynastic Rule named Dynasty Lockdown:

When the Dynastic Rules are described as being under or in an Endgame Lockdown, no Proposals can be made that add to, remove or change their contents.



Enact another Dynastic Rule named Homestretch:

This Dynasty is in a Dynasty Lockdown.

Retrying that idea from Kevan; let’s see making it in the Dynastic Ruleset to test is a good idea

Comments

Kevan: he/him

01-02-2023 11:27:30 UTC

These two terms (Endgame Lockdown, Dynasty Lockdown) don’t match.

I assumed Endgame Lockdown would be dynamic, activating automatically when a player had crossed a pre-agreed threshold of having “nearly won” (eg. “if a player has three or more Cones, the game is in Endgame Lockdown”), beyond which catch-up proposals are unambiguously off the table.

But if the group feels that the dynastic has already reached that point, fair enough.

Josh: Observer he/they

01-02-2023 11:41:30 UTC

Having this as two separate rules is also pointless; if the kicker term isn’t going to be reused then a simple “no Proposals can be made that add to, remove or change the contents of the Dynastic Rules” will suffice.

Josh: Observer he/they

01-02-2023 15:07:41 UTC

against Inconsistent terms, unnecessary ruleset duplication, and still-needed ruleset changes (eg Means of Production).

Trapdoorspyder: he/him

01-02-2023 15:44:20 UTC

against

Habanero:

01-02-2023 15:50:37 UTC

against

Chiiika: she/her

01-02-2023 16:49:59 UTC

against sk; apparently not on a compy is a issue for me; will reintroduce now