Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Proposal: Housekeeping

Reaches quorum and passes at 8-1. No Sun bonus, though. -Purplebeard

Adminned at 23 Jun 2011 01:16:26 UTC

Move the second bullet in Numbers and Variables to under the third bullet in Rules and Proposals.

It doesn’t have anything to do with numbers or variables and should be placed under the Rules and Proposals header.

Comments

mideg:

21-06-2011 22:27:06 UTC

for Trivial.

Winner:

21-06-2011 22:52:25 UTC

Nah this really isn’t trivial at all :P

Yoda:

21-06-2011 22:57:27 UTC

for Yes, this is very trivial.

aguydude:

21-06-2011 23:01:08 UTC

for Trivial

Galtori:

22-06-2011 02:46:28 UTC

for trivial

Bucky:

22-06-2011 05:36:57 UTC

for trivial

SingularByte: he/him

22-06-2011 07:12:08 UTC

for Trivial, although strictly you could put the second bullet anywhere from 3.3.3 to 3.3.6 since they’re all under the last bullet of 3.3.2

Purplebeard:

22-06-2011 07:28:02 UTC

for Trivial

mideg:

22-06-2011 08:18:45 UTC

@Singular: U sure? They are presented to be “under” the last bullet of 3.3.2, but in terms of the game, they are in a completly different subrule. One subrule is not below or above another subrule.

SingularByte: he/him

22-06-2011 08:48:33 UTC

Since “under” isn’t a keyword, the usual English definition is used. I believe that would make subrules above or below each other.

mideg:

22-06-2011 09:03:58 UTC

@singular:
I disagree. No rule is above or beneath any other rule. They are written down in a certain order, but that order is not determined anywhere (or is it?)

If there was a place where the order of things was determined, then “under” would be properly defined, otherwise only the representation of the rules are ordered the way they are. Imagine writing down the rules on index cards. Then the order of the rules becomes unimportant.

Yoda:

22-06-2011 15:10:14 UTC

against CoV. Singular has a good point. This is basically up to the whim of the admin who enacts it.

Still trivial btw.

scshunt:

22-06-2011 17:34:19 UTC

for trivial