Proposal: I don’t know that rule
Passes 7-0-1 with more than Quorum in favor. -Bucky
Adminned at 25 Jan 2021 22:48:28 UTC
After “an Emperor who is not a Signatory to a Treaty is not required to follow its provisions, and generally cannot take actions defined by that Treaty unless it explicitly states otherwise.”
add “When a treaty mentions to ‘Emperor’ or ‘Emperors’ it only refers to Emperors who are also Signatories of that Treaty unless it explicitly states otherwise”
Right now “Treaties only bind their Signatories;” is a bit unclear
Should a treaty saying “An Emperor may steal 10 coins from another Emperor” allow signatories of that treaty to steal coins from any emperor, even those who are not signatories?
I’d rather default to only applying to signatories than the other way around. Though we should clarify either way.
for further discussion.
Josh: he/they