vetoed by card, new dynasty
Adminned at 01 Aug 2018 22:18:59 UTC
In “Legacy”, replace “A wizard’s legacy is equal to their glory plus half of their infamy” with:-
A wizard’s legacy is equal to their glory minus half of their infamy.
Plus to minus. It looks like at least two of us misread the scoring as the more obvious “infamy is bad”.
Sure, I’m mostly just curious as to whether anyone else misread it. (Or whether enough people support a tactical amendment towards punishing Suspicion, I suppose.)
I did not realize how subtle that was. But at any rate, its still anyone’s game, and now folks are aware. And reading the subtle implications of rules is very much nomic.
Interesting that as the only person who feels strongly enough to vote against, if the Historian were to instead vote DEF, the Imperial Deferential would flip it from 3-3 failing to quorum 6-0.
The one person who has no stake except writing the original rule!
Trigon, Brendan, and Corona should really have this decision. Two of them have voted, but Trigon’s vote is especially meaningful, because he has a chance of winning. If this passes, he will go from a legacy of 30 to legacy of 4. If he votes for it, I’ll happily change.
BlogNomic is an online Nomic: a self-modifying game where changing the rules is part of the game. Players make blog posts proposing additions or alterations to the ruleset, discussing and casting votes in the comments: if enough vote in favour, the rules are changed and play continues.
The game has been running since 2003 and resets every month or so. Have a look around the wiki for more information and history. New players are always welcome and can join in the game at any time.
BlogNomic is powered by pMachine ExpressionEngine.
card:
is it not part of a legacy to be remembered in infamy? aren’t many historical figures who did terrible things remembered above those who did good?
for now