Sunday, February 19, 2006

Proposal: Last Man Not Shambling

Vetoed. -Elias IX

Adminned at 20 Feb 2006 17:45:57 UTC

Change the text or Rule 2.18 (Victory), which currently reads

If a Swashbuckler is the only Swashbuckler not in Davy Jones’ Locker, e may declare victory.

to read

If a Swashbuckler is the only Swashbuckler not in Davy Jones’ Locker or a Zombie, e may declare victory.

Comments

JelloGoesWiggle:

19-02-2006 11:57:28 UTC

yeah that should say ‘of Rule 2.18’, not ‘or Rule 2.18’.  Way to proofread =\

Igthorn:

19-02-2006 12:12:34 UTC

It’s like when you print something and you only see the typo as you finish clicking the print button.

On another note, you seem to be quite an enthusiastic poster - can I invite you to my nomic card game - I need at least one more player. Bucky and Banja would be welcome additions as well, while I am at it.  There is a post with more details and a web address a little further down the main page.


for

Josh: Observer he/they

19-02-2006 12:34:35 UTC

for

Shadowclaw:

19-02-2006 13:32:44 UTC

for

Hix:

19-02-2006 19:11:13 UTC

for

Igthorn:

19-02-2006 20:38:50 UTC

Am I reading your proposal right?
(a) A swashbuckler can declare victory if e is the only one not in Davey Jones Locker
(b) A swashbuckler can declare victory if e is a zombie
against

Bucky:

19-02-2006 21:06:36 UTC

good point.  against due to ambiguity unless another proposal modifies it. 

Better wording would be, “If a Swashbuckler is the only Swashbuckler neither in Davy Jones’ Locker nor a Zombie, e may declare victory.”

I don’t have a spare proposal.  could someone else propose the fix?

Igthorn:

19-02-2006 21:27:08 UTC

Now Jello don’t (since I made the following mistakes)

1 - Change the wording of the proposal.
2 - Try to kill it suggesting selfkill as a reason.

Request a veto.

JelloGoesWiggle:

19-02-2006 23:12:03 UTC

Sounds good; with a veto I’d gladly ammend it to be clearer.

predisastered:

20-02-2006 06:59:55 UTC

against

Josh: Observer he/they

20-02-2006 09:05:41 UTC

against

Kevan: he/him

20-02-2006 12:23:12 UTC

against

Elias IX:

21-02-2006 01:43:26 UTC

veto for aforementioned reasons.