Saturday, June 18, 2011

Proposal: Let’s Get This Over With

Reached a quorum 2-8.—Yoda

Adminned at 20 Jun 2011 12:24:09 UTC

Ely achieves victory; the game goes into Hiatus and proceeds in a new Dynasty with Ely as the Landlord as if a Declaration of Victory posted by Ely had been enacted.

Ely has a massive resource advantage and at the current rate of things, it’s far too easy for an interested player to prolong the game because it’s pretty easy to get a ridiculous defense (just get a couple of Cabbage in each row and you can shoot down any useful offensive zombies easily.

Let’s just save ourselves another month.

Comments

ais523:

18-06-2011 23:58:43 UTC

not quite idle yet for (just in case this gets speedy quorumed)

Klisz:

18-06-2011 23:59:02 UTC

I unidle. Quorum is 9.  for

Yoda:

19-06-2011 00:21:35 UTC

against Ummm… if we’re going to do this, let’s do it the proper way through an actual DoV rather than somehow hand-waving a new dynasty in.

Yoda:

19-06-2011 00:22:42 UTC

By the proper way, I mean having the proposal say that Ely achieves victory and allowing the full DoV process to go through rather than trying to shortcut it.

scshunt:

19-06-2011 00:22:49 UTC

Why? A DoV is just a waste of time if a proposal awards a win; better to short-circuit it.

Yoda:

19-06-2011 00:29:58 UTC

Simply shifting the dynasty be proposal seems shady at best.  Plus, I think that the new dynasty alert goes out when a DoV is posted, which is what attracts the mass of new and unidling players.

Yoda:

19-06-2011 00:32:23 UTC

I just want to make it clear that I’m not opposed to a “farmer X achieves victory” proposal, I would just like to see it go through the proper channels.

ais523:

19-06-2011 00:44:24 UTC

The new dynasty alert hasn’t ever worked. (Also, I think it’s meant to be tied to ascension addresses.)

Kevan: he/him

19-06-2011 00:54:51 UTC

There’s an RSS feed for Ascension Addresses, and I manually copy it to the Yahoo mailing list.

It seems a bit impolite to force someone to declare victory, without giving them any say in the matter. And I’d be disappointed if I was a background player with a clever scam lined up, who didn’t check the game at weekends.

Galtori:

19-06-2011 01:39:35 UTC

against For obvious reasons.

qwertyu63:

19-06-2011 02:18:00 UTC

against

aguydude:

19-06-2011 02:54:34 UTC

against I’m sure if we all work together, we can take him down.

Winner:

19-06-2011 03:40:24 UTC

against

SingularByte: he/him

19-06-2011 06:38:14 UTC

against Ely has 229 resources total. I have 422. Purplebeard has 463. How exactly does Ely have a massive resource advantage?

Ely:

19-06-2011 11:59:00 UTC

I people find this dynasty fun and do want to go on, let them go on.
Abstaining.

redtara: they/them

19-06-2011 14:58:16 UTC

At times like this - when people still enjoy the current dynasty but it seems to be settling down to a grind-off - I think it can be helpful to do a partial overhaul of the game mechanics. Cut out or streamline ones that aren’t working well, and introduce some new ones. Blognomic often acts like there are two choices: keep playing the same way we already are, or start a new dynasty.

Josh: he/they

19-06-2011 15:10:40 UTC

Seconding Ienpw on this. It’s not like the ruleset is finished - one of the points of a nomic is that you can use proposals to erode advantages like this, either by feathering exchange rates or adding new mechanics. It seems way too early to just give up.

mideg:

19-06-2011 16:49:11 UTC

against End it now that I just realized how the mechanic works? Now, please don’t!

Ely:

19-06-2011 16:50:52 UTC

*if

Purplebeard:

19-06-2011 20:14:42 UTC

against

BellEt:

20-06-2011 17:31:28 UTC

imperial Im only for it if the landlord is ok with it.