Wednesday, December 01, 2010

Call for Judgment: Loophole in Rule 2.3 Ages

This doesn’t have any effect on the ruleset or gamestate -Darth

Adminned at 01 Dec 2010 09:41:16 UTC

In the Rule “2.3 Ages” the text

The Divinity who had the highest value for Prominence at the end of an Age is considered to be the Optimus Divinity for the next Age.

could be changed to avoid possible problems in case of a tie at the end of an Age.

Comments

Blacky:

12-01-2010 14:10:32 UTC

against

Sorry! The post shall go on to describe the issue, and measures that shall be taken to resolve it.
No measures are described. However made a proposal to solve that issue.

SethOcean:

12-01-2010 14:22:28 UTC

against
Self-kill (even though self-killing a CfJ is not explicit in the ruleset)

I misinterpreted the CfJ versus Proposal ... I was trying to make a Proposal without an action LOL

Purplebeard:

12-01-2010 14:48:17 UTC

against This wouldn’t do anything if passed. To write a meaningful proposal (or Call for Judgment), you need to explicitly state what you want to happen (e.g. ‘add a rule with the following text’, or ‘change this part of that rule to the following’).

Kevan:

12-01-2010 14:48:41 UTC

against

FuzzyLogic:

12-01-2010 15:24:10 UTC

against

Brendan:

12-01-2010 15:56:47 UTC

against

Ambisinister:

12-01-2010 16:00:14 UTC

against