Sunday, February 24, 2013

Proposal: Make for yourself a name

Vetoed. -RaichuKFM

Resolution reverted - cannot be resolved during hiatus. Josh

Adminned at 27 Feb 2013 14:48:02 UTC

Enact a new rule entitled “Statements”:

As a weekly action, an Honourable Member may make a story post, with the subject beginning “Statement:”.  The body of the post may include any statement that the Member wishes to make.  If, within 24 hours of the statement being posted, a quorum of Hon. Members from the same party comment on the post affirmatively (in words or by using the FOR voting icon), then the Hon. Member who posted will gain 4 Credibility.  If, however, within 72 hours of the statement being posted a quorum of Hon. Members from the same party comment negatively (in words or by using the AGAINST voting icon), then the poster will lose 4 Credibility.  In any other case, no Credibility is lost or gained.  If an Hon. Member comments multiple times on the same statement, then their FIRST comment will count, and not the rest.  An Hon. Member’s comment to their own Statement does not count to the tally of the quorum.

More part dynamics, with mechanism to gain Credibility?  The Credibility gain is the most so far, but balanced in being 1/2 needed to convert to PC.

Comments

RaichuKFM:

02-24-2013 04:29:27 UTC

imperial

omd:

02-24-2013 04:56:29 UTC

for

Spitemaster:

02-24-2013 06:22:37 UTC

against Someone join the Religious party if this passes, and we can trade Credibility.

Larrytheturtle:

02-24-2013 07:44:18 UTC

against

Josh: HE/HIM

02-24-2013 09:16:25 UTC

for

Skju:

02-24-2013 14:08:33 UTC

against I don’t like how it’s weekly and party-dependent. We need a more flexible, fair Credibility generator.

MurphEngineer:

02-24-2013 21:00:57 UTC

against

Purplebeard:

02-25-2013 08:04:15 UTC

against

RaichuKFM:

02-26-2013 16:57:14 UTC

against Moot now anyway.

RaichuKFM:

02-27-2013 22:47:11 UTC

veto